第14番染色体父親性ダイソミー症候群

BACKGROUND: Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous imprinting disorder. The most common molecular defects are loss of methylation of the H19/IGF2:IG-DMR on chromosome 11p15.5, followed by maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7. Further molecular lesions are genetic variants in the PLAG1 oncogene, as well as in the transcription factor HMGA2 and the fetal growth factor IGF2. A phenotypic overlap exists between SRS and Temple syndrome (TS14) that is also characterized by growth restriction but associated with abnormalities in the imprinted chromosome 14q32 gene cluster. In TS14 patients, the germline MEG3/DLK1: IG-DMR is hypomethylated and the MEG8:Int2-DMR gains methylation probably as consequence of transcriptional readthrough from the MEG3 promoter on the paternal chromosome. However, the functional role of the MEG8 DMR remains unknown. RESULTS: We analysed the DNA methylation of 11-12 imprinted regions in 17 cases with clinical SRS features and heterozygous for a PLAG1 variant. We observed a specific loss of methylation of the MEG8:Int2-DMR in the ten cases carrying pathogenic PLAG1 variants that result in stable aberrant proteins. Normal MEG8 methylation was observed in the cases carrying variants of uncertain pathogenicity or gene deletions. Most of the PLAG1 cases are familial and both epigenetic and genetic defects co-segregated within the families. Additionally, we assessed the methylation status of the MEG8:Int2-DMR in several SRS patients with HMGA2 or IGF2 variants, H19/IGF2:IG-DMR-LoM and upd(7)mat and all of them showed normal methylation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that pathogenic PLAG1 variants leading to stable aberrant PLAG1 proteins and possibly acting in a dominant-negative manner influence methylation of the MEG8 locus. This study suggests a new pathogenetic mechanism of the PLAG1 gene in SRS, involving imprinted genes in the chr14q32 cluster through deregulation of the MEG8:Int2-DMR and provides an epigenetic signature that may be used to assess the damaging potential of the PLAG1 variants.

Temple syndrome is an imprinting disorder resulting from abnormal genomic or epigenomic aberrations of chromosome 14 including maternal uniparental disomy (matUPD), paternal deletion of 14q32, or aberrant methylation of the imprinting control regions at 14q32. Understanding the underlying molecular mechanism is essential to understanding the recurrence risk and physical effects. Currently, diagnosis requires the detection of aberrant methylation and copy number loss via methylation-sensitive assays such as methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and short tandem repeat analysis to detect matUPD and the presence of epimutation. Therefore, a one-step approach that can detect aberrant methylation and underlying genetic mechanisms would be of high clinical value. Here we use nanopore sequencing to delineate the molecular diagnosis of a case with Temple syndrome. We demonstrate the application of nanopore sequencing to detect aberrant methylation and underlying genetic mechanisms simultaneously in this case, thus providing a proof of concept for a one-step approach for molecular diagnosis of this disorder.

CONTEXT: Defects in MKRN3, DLK1, KISS1, and KISS1R and some disorders, such as Temple syndrome (TS14), cause central precocious puberty (CPP). Recently, pathogenic variants (PVs) in MECP2 have been reported to be associated with CPP. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to clarify the contribution of (epi)genetic abnormalities to CPP and clinical and hormonal features in each etiology. METHODS: We conducted targeted sequencing for MKRN3, DLK1, MECP2, KISS1, and KISS1R and methylation analysis for screening of imprinting disorders such as TS14 associated with CPP in 90 patients with CPP (no history of brain injuries and negative brain magnetic resonance imaging) and collected their clinical and laboratory data. We measured serum DLK1 levels in 3 patients with TS14 and serum MKRN3 levels in 2 patients with MKRN3 genetic defects, together with some etiology-unknown patients with CPP and controls. RESULTS: We detected 8 patients with TS14 (6, epimutation; 1, mosaic maternal uniparental disomy chromosome 14; 1, microdeletion) and 3 patients with MKRN3 genetic defects (1, PV; 1, 13-bp deletion in the 5'-untranslated region [5'-UTR]; 1, microdeletion) with family histories of paternal early puberty. There were no patients with PVs identified in MECP2, KISS1, or KISS1R. We confirmed low serum MKRN3 level in the patient with a deletion in 5'-UTR. The median height at initial evaluation of TS14 patients was lower than that of all patients. Six patients with TS14 were born small for gestational age (SGA). CONCLUSION: (Epi)genetic causes were identified in 12.2% of patients with CPP at our center. For patients with CPP born SGA or together with family histories of paternal early puberty, (epi)genetic testing for TS14 and MKRN3 genetic defects should be considered.